Discover the fundamental differences between fail-safe vs. fail-secure locking systems. Dive into our comprehensive guide to learn about their advantages and appropriate uses
Last Updated on May 2, 2024 by Vincent Zhu
In the world of locking systems, ‘fail-safe’ and ‘fail-secure’ are terms you’ll frequently encounter. These terms describe what happens to a lock during a power failure or an emergency. But what exactly do they mean, and how do they impact a facility’s security and safety?
This article aims to demystify these terms, helping you understand the differences between fail-safe and fail-secure locking systems. We’ll look at how each system operates, its advantages, and the situations in which they are most appropriate.
Fail-safe and fail-secure are two design principles primarily used in safety and security systems, including locks, access control systems, and other types of machinery. The key difference is how they react to power loss or system failure.
Fail-Safe: In a fail-safe system, safety is prioritized. If power is lost or a system fails, it defaults to a state considered safe for its users or operators.
Fail-Secure: In a fail-secure system, security is prioritized. This means that if power is lost or a system failure occurs, the system defaults to a state that maintains security.
The key difference between fail-safe and fail-secure lies in their priorities during a power loss or system failure. Fail-safe systems prioritize safety and tend to default to an open or nonrestrictive state, whereas fail-secure systems prioritize security and typically default to a closed or restrictive state.
The choice between a fail-safe and a fail-secure design will depend on the specific needs and requirements of the situation, considering factors such as the level of security needed, the potential risks associated with a failure, and applicable safety regulations. Often, both principles are combined to balance safety and security needs.
A common misconception about fail-safe and fail-secure systems is that one is inherently “better” or “safer” than the other.
Whether a fail-safe or fail-secure system is more appropriate depends entirely on the specific application and its requirements. For example, in a high-security environment, preventing unauthorized access at all times might be more important, making a fail-secure system more appropriate.
On the other hand, in a public building where safety is paramount and the threat level is low, a fail-safe system that allows people to exit freely in an emergency might be the best choice.
Another misconception is that fail-secure systems are unsafe because they could trap people inside a building during a power outage or system failure.
However, safety regulations typically require people always to exit inside, even if a fail-secure door is locked from the outside. This is often achieved by pairing the fail-secure lock with a mechanical push bar or similar device inside the door.
Finally, some might think that a fail-safe system is always open when power is lost, which could compromise security. While it’s true that a fail-safe lock opens during a power outage or system failure, it’s important to note that these locks can be designed to work with backup power systems to maintain security during temporary power outages.
“Fail-safe” is a term used in various fields such as engineering, computer science, and aviation to refer to a design principle where a system or mechanism is designed to automatically revert to a safe condition or cease operation in the event of a failure or malfunction.
The main purpose of a fail-safe mechanism is to prevent a system from causing harm or damage when something goes wrong. This could refer to harm or damage to people, property, the system itself, or other systems.
“Fail-secure,” also known as “fail-locked,” refers to a design principle in which a device or system defaults to a secure or locked state when experiencing a power loss or system failure.
It’s important to note that while fail-secure systems can maintain security during a failure, they could potentially compromise safety by restricting egress during emergencies.
Fail-safe locks are security devices that unlock automatically when power is lost, or a specific signal is sent to the lock. Their primary purpose is to ensure the safety of people inside a building or a specific area in case of emergencies, such as power outages or fires.
An example is the magnetic locks used on emergency exit doors in many public buildings. These doors are often designed to be fail-safe so that people can quickly and easily exit the building in an emergency, even if the electronic locking system loses power.
It’s important to note that while fail-safe locks enhance safety by ensuring people can exit, they can potentially reduce security during power outages or system malfunctions because they default to the unlocked state. This is the main trade-off between fail-safe (safety-focused) and fail-secure (security-focused) systems.
Fail-secure locks, also known as fail-locked or non-fail safe locks, are designed to stay locked when power is lost or a system failure occurs. They are typically used in security-sensitive situations where it’s important to maintain a secure environment, even during power outages or other failures.
A fail-secure lock would lock the door when power is lost in a door-locking system. Only a mechanical key or physical intervention could unlock the door.
For example, many high-security facilities, such as banks or data centers, use fail-secure locks on their exterior doors. These doors remain locked outside during a power outage, preventing unauthorized access.
It’s important to note that while fail-secure locks enhance security, they can potentially pose safety risks during emergencies if people need to exit quickly and the doors are locked.
The cost of fail-safe versus fail-secure systems, particularly in the context of electronic locksets, can be influenced by various factors, and it’s not necessarily the case that one is more expensive than the other by default. Here are some aspects to consider:
In summary, choosing between fail-safe and fail-secure is not primarily a cost decision but is based on safety, security, and compliance needs. The costs associated with these systems can be influenced more by other factors, such as the specific hardware chosen, the complexity of the installation, and the potential indirect costs related to security and liability risks.
The installation process for fail-safe and fail-secure electronic locksets will be relatively similar in most cases, as they require similar steps and components. However, there are a few key considerations that can differ between the two:
In summary, while the basic installation process for fail-safe and fail-secure locks is similar, the specific requirements and considerations can vary based on the type of lock, the type of door, and local safety and security regulations. It’s always a good idea to hire a professional installer familiar with these types of systems and the relevant regulations in your area.
Deciding whether a fail-safe or a fail-secure lock is right for your door involves considering several factors related to the purpose of the door, the overall security needs, and safety regulations. Here are some considerations:
Remember, the choice between fail-safe and fail-secure isn’t about which is universally better; it’s about which is more appropriate for your situation. Consulting with a professional locksmith or security consultant can help you make the best choice for your needs.
In closing, the choice between fail-safe and fail-secure locking systems greatly depends on your specific needs and the nature of the secured facility. Both systems have their unique advantages and appropriate uses.
Fail-safe locks are designed to prioritize safety, ensuring free exit during power failures or emergencies. In contrast, fail-secure locks prioritize security, remaining locked even when power is lost.
Resolve Eufy Smart Lock not connecting to bluetooth with our troubleshooting guide on power, connectivity,…
Expert tips for Eufy smart lock calibration failed issues: calibration help, optimal performance, and support…
Learn how to reset a Simplex lock without the combination. Quick guide for troubleshooting Dormakaba…
Quickly resolve dormakaba product issues with our troubleshooting guide covering common problems and maintenance tips.
Learn to reset unknown Kaba lock codes with our guide on models, tools, and safety.…
Quickly resolve Kaba 790 lock issues with our troubleshooting guide covering common errors, maintenance, and…